Hyrican GA-78LMT-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hyrican GA-78LMT-S2P (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121128
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '18 at 18:16
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 114 53% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 185 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 357GB free Firmware: UG3000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (A5) Unknown 100 100 31 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 453 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 45 193273528360 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 34361049096 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 155 (EA) Unknown 100 100 349 (F1) Unknown 100 100 167 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	40.5% Average	Read 254 Write 201 Mixed 236 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 5.61 51% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 64.3 DQ Mixed 6.62 26% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 57%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 172 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (A5) Unknown 100 100 111 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 6 (A9) Unknown 100 100 144 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 44 188978561057 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 133146607647 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 185 (EA) Unknown 100 100 618 (F1) Unknown 100 100 238 (F2) Unknown 100 100 260 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	32.1% Below average	Read 258 Write 82.4 Mixed 175 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 4.38 48% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 43.2 DQ Mixed 6.24 23% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 816GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 98 (03) Spinup time 117 117 17192648902 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 138 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 33790 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 116 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 157 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 157 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 197569216545 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.1% Good	Read 117 Write 114 Mixed 125 90% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.38 93% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 74%
OCZ ATV 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID ac02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	6.14% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 8.96 Mixed 12.1 16% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.81 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 16% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.14% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 15.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hyrican GA-78LMT-S2P

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)