Lenovo 10JAS01G00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10JAS01G00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '18 at 09:59
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 105
47% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 106
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 30EE) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1013.0
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.38
Parallax 6.12
4% 5.64 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 5.03
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.54 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 171
Mixed 112
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 103%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MN68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback