Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '18 at 06:07
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 77.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,086
101% 843 Pts
64-Core 1,667
103% 1,667 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 3988) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 79.4
76% 87.3 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 72.2
63% 78.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,888
Write 1,815
Mixed 1,666
400% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 38.2
175% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 30.9
177% 412 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 265%
Great: 353%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
126GB free
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,414
336% 1,516 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 26.7
154% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 114
110% 177 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 205%
Great: 220%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 143
Mixed 145
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.21
100% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 170
Mixed 158
134% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.22
70% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
4TB free
Firmware: 0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 141
Write 144
Mixed 155
111% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.34
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
306GB free, PID ab24
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 113
Write 115
Mixed 112
147% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.34
40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 7.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback