Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '18 at 01:35
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 941 83% 707 Pts	64-Core 1,306 81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1616 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 123 Parallax 111 96% 117 fps	MRender 101 Gravity 108 Splatting 94.5 82% 101 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 151GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10241 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 678 (B1) Unknown 97 97 51 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 40 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 10 (EB) Unknown 99 99 347 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20275590773	90.6% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 419 Mixed 419 100% 452 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 22.1 127% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 71.8 78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 124%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 7,214 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,770 Write 1,384 Mixed 1,606 422% 1,920 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 62.8 237% 85.5 MB/s	DQ Read 56.9 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 39.4 47% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 243%
WD Blue 250GB-$90 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 102GB free Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 304 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 47 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10616958 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 47 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 301 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 45 193274707993 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 154620657700 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 658 (EA) Unknown 100 100 924 (F1) Unknown 253 253 890 (F2) Unknown 253 253 237 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	70.5% Very good	Read 501 Write 349 Mixed 230 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 12.5 95% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 29.1 DQ Write 56 DQ Mixed 40 31% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 170 3983 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1801 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 21943 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 587 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 475 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32275 (C2) HDA temperature 122 99 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 195 27 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	77.2% Very good	Read 147 Write 121 Mixed 124 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.26 96% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 86%
NORELSYS 106X 2TB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 115 Write 114 Mixed 100 140% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.36 71% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 80%
WD Elements 10B8 750GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 197GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 73.1 Write 71.5 Mixed 66.7 90% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.23 73% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB 40,300 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 42.7 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 33.2 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 38.6 SC Mixed 27.6 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)