Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 22:27
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 73.2 2-Core 135 62% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 454 42% 351 Pts	64-Core 453 28% 453 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 95.9 56% 78.2 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 67 Splatting 57 52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56 3,862 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7700 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2477 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 124 (AE) Unknown 100 100 259 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 413 (E8) Unknown 95 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 745 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2082549074 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2860527466	42.5% Average	Read 446 Write 207 Mixed 267 67% 307 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 9.41 4K Mixed 5.21 39% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 7.32 DQ Mixed 5.97 8% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 48%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 64 (03) Spinup time 175 175 21497512247 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 438 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 126 126 32 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 654 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 436 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 438 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 438 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 236224380957 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	106% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 174 Mixed 167 134% 179 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.19 87% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%
Excelstor Technology J9250S 250GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 232GB free Firmware: GM2OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 141 (03) Spinup time 112 112 12896698552 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5427 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 27 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17643 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4855 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5463 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5463 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 231929085978 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	50% Above average	Read 86.4 Write 87.8 Mixed 85.8 65% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.46 111% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB 6,948 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.7% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 18.7 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 13.1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16