Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 09:02
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	85%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 191 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 753 67% 567 Pts	64-Core 1,198 74% 1,198 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 115 Parallax 97.8 91% 108 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 99.6 Splatting 101 81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8163 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 331 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 93 (AE) Unknown 100 100 127 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 98 98 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 48 223339020316 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 7 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 101319145054 (F7) Unknown 100 100 3169480787 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1162061262 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4414 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	60% Good	Read 479 Write 196 Mixed 337 74% 337 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 13.9 90% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 13.9 25% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 158 Write 145 Mixed 103 101% 136 MB/s	4K Read 7.65 4K Write 5.49 4K Mixed 0.47 473% 4.54 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 94%
Seagate ST2000DL001 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 981GB free Firmware: CC92 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 88 221707640 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8125 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 62 190740262 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 44938 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2006 (B7) Unknown 89 89 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6401 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540394081 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 521994271 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1703 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6634 (C2) HDA temperature 31 52 64424509471 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 119 99 221707640 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 94 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 94 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -31181462528244 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3062553448 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2472105466	64.7% Good	Read 111 Write 115 Mixed 101 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.19 69% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 71%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 764GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 162 6000 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1184 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 106 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 80 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5466 (C2) HDA temperature 124 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.6% Good	Read 111 Write 111 Mixed 101 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.15 65% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 376GB free Firmware: 9401 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 88.4 Write 76.9 Mixed 75 60% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 7.76 4K Mixed 0.62 236% 2.98 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 94%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 268GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 177 7558 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2231 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22083 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 189 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 126 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 55848 (C2) HDA temperature 122 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	81.3% Excellent	Read 148 Write 136 Mixed 115 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 240GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 180 7500 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1759 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10848 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 155 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 107 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 33027 (C2) HDA temperature 123 104 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 115 Write 84.8 Mixed 98.2 75% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.27 83% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40 28,855 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 25.8 92% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 20.1 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	561x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	151x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16