Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 01:58
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 424
57% 424 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 474
Write 263
Mixed 276
74% 337 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 26.9
114% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 66.6
93% 176 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
362GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 133
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.19
63% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-027.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback