| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
| Graphics | 41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '18 at 23:32 |
| Run Duration | 82 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
|
107%
Outstanding
|
102% 183 Pts
|
100% 813 Pts
|
81% 1,312 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2567 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.6%
Average
|
38% 48.4 fps
|
48% 58.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
112% 503 MB/s
|
140% 54.6 MB/s
|
120% 236 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
107%
Outstanding
|
106% 37.2 GB/s
|
100% 35 GB/s
|
82% 48.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,382 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,696x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 837x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 172x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 394x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 335x |
| RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 229x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $971 |