Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160805
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 21:39
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 85% 148 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 690 68% 558 Pts	64-Core 893 55% 893 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 170 Parallax 165 127% 164 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 154 Splatting 109 101% 125 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 83 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 248 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 12 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 59 176094380069 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 6135750393 (F7) Unknown 100 100 192283446 (F8) Unknown 100 100 49458995 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1925 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	76% Very good	Read 482 Write 341 Mixed 322 84% 382 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 12.9 87% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 12.1 72% 167 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 253 168 1375 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5000 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13474 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2319 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 88794 (C2) HDA temperature 118 107 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.6% Good	Read 102 Write 109 Mixed 99.6 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.16 74% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 791GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5 (03) Spinup time 172 171 4358 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2624 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14591 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2538 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 70 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2553 (C2) HDA temperature 110 100 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 6 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 194 66	75.5% Very good	Read 132 Write 131 Mixed 127 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.41 138% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 1,053 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	125% Outstanding	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 58 MC Mixed 46.1 141% 49.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 21 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	6x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	5x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 76%, 7,414 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 1,630 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $439

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16