| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus P5KC (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080625 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '18 at 21:00 |
| Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
| Run User | ARM-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
49%
Average
|
43% 63.8 Pts
|
17% 130 Pts
|
9% 152 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52%
Above average
|
48% 63.4 fps
|
59% 72 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
39.5%
Below average
|
39% 177 MB/s
|
68% 21.4 MB/s
|
14% 23.5 MB/s
|
|
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
114% 152 MB/s
|
101% 0.88 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21%
Poor
|
20% 6.97 GB/s
|
11% 3.83 GB/s
|
46% 86.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5KC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 42x |
| Xeon X5460Intel $190Bench 52%, 10,360 samples | 23x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 12x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 8x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $129 |