Quanta TW9/SW9

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Quanta TW9/SW9 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091104
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 91.7 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 114 59% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 201 22% 173 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240M 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Quanta(152D 0828) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 2.87 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 1.25 2% 2.94 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.43 3% 3.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 106 12520147 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 67353677141705 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5164 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 174 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 53 17183342626 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 12520147 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 12520147 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 12520147 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10029 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8394 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8394 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10842	28.5% Poor	Read 254 Write 117 Mixed 175 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 5.28 30% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17.5 DQ Write 88.2 DQ Mixed 39.1 34% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 81%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 17GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 180 1650 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15704 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7876 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8258 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 353 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 161 161 118204 (C2) HDA temperature 111 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	38% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 66.7 Mixed 69.3 51% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.23 64% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5428-065.A00LF 1x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM 1333 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.5% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Quanta TW9/SW9

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	39x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	28x
Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples	10x

GPU
GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples	63x
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	23x
GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
JD120 120GBJamesdonkeyBench 62%, 1,575 samples	4x
MX100 512GBCrucial $200Bench 88%, 31,545 samples	3x

RAM
M2S4G64CB8HB5N-BE M2S2G64CB88B5N-BE 6GBUnknownBench 29%, 27 samples	6x
M2N2G64CB8HC5N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 46 samples	5x
GMB20028SOX8271066 4GBUnknownBench 36%, 7 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16