Asrock A55M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock A55M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111014
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 18:58
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 75
41% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 111
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 30.2
19% 27.7 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 32.7
24% 28.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 191
Write 133
Mixed 118
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 11
58% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 52.8
DQ Mixed 12.2
17% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
465GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 163
Mixed 25.2
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Read 17
Write 6.52
Mixed 10.1
13% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.86
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.15
28% 2.02 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67F1600G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-HVS Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A55M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $121
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback