Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 18:48
Run Duration2556 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 155
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 472
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0520AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48% Average
Read 211
Write 194
Mixed 199
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 17.6
86% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 19.3
23% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48%
Great: 85%
Toshiba E300 2TB-$69
450GB free
Firmware: MZ4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 5.63
52% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.15
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
426GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 107
Write 94.8
Mixed 54.9
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.27
94% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
197GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 94.4
Mixed 41.3
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.38
107% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate Portable 500GB
191GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 23.4
33% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 1TB
60GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 16.1
Mixed 6.81
17% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.07
45% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
58GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 0.94
Write 0.82
Mixed 0.87
1% 0.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.43
40% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 38%
HP c485w 16GB
15GB free, PID 3807
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Read 0.93
Write 0.78
Mixed 0.84
1% 0.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.02
5% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback