Asus 1005P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.62%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAsus 1005P  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1005P
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 18:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom N450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
SC Int 14.1
SC Float 5.7
SC Mixed 8.1
8% 9.3 Pts
QC Int 22.3
QC Float 9.1
QC Mixed 13.6
3% 15 Pts
MC Int 27.1
MC Float 11
MC Mixed 15.8
3% 18 Pts
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
KingFast 60GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q070 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 248
Write 104
Mixed 147
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 2.98
38% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 17.7
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
8.22% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 0.4
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 28%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 1005P Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1005P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $58HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback