Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 16:40
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 372
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.8% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 68.8
45% 53.3 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 45
36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 416
Mixed 421
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 28.9
150% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 24.8
94% 208 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 114
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.27
70% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1TB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 106
Mixed 102
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.39
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2OZ 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 28.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback