Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation 690 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0F9394
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060630
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 16:21
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.00GHz 131 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 50.7 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 47.7 28% 41 Pts	4-Core 87.2 8-Core 119 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 285 398 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Nvidia(10DE 0334) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.09% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.09% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 152GB free Firmware: 2E04 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 54.6 Write 55.4 Mixed 54.3 41% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.51 106% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 35%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 102GB free Firmware: 2E04 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 53 Write 52.5 Mixed 51.5 39% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.39 106% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 35%
Seagate ST3120213AS 120GB 709 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: L Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 25.7 Mixed 26.6 22% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.24 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 33%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1GB free Firmware: 2E04 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 35.7 Write 36.7 Mixed 37 28% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.48 110% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16