Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell OptiPlex 9010
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 9010 (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170510
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 14:01
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 167 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 326 44% 326 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.6% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.8 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 36.6 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB 8,167 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AC01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 93 2163 (03) Spinup time 94 94 2880 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3012 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10258 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 21035 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 30 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2983 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 93 2163 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 3076 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 55 420085785 (C2) HDA temperature 75 52 470417433 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4056144 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 97 97 135	46.1% Average	Read 81.6 Write 78.8 Mixed 68.1 57% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.34 92% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 58%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 67GB free Firmware: 2BA30014 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 89 3577 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1317 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2292 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 975 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 18 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 132 (C2) HDA temperature 64 55 206159347737 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 13 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 28289	39.1% Below average	Read 75.7 Write 60.5 Mixed 66.1 51% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.32 83% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 59%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free, PID 10a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 59.3 Write 63.3 Mixed 58.7 78% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.16 71% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 10 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,834x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	769x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	672x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	468x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	359x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	359x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	159x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	56x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16