Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 13:22
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-6300-$70
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.8% Average
SC Int 78.1
SC Float 66.2
SC Mixed 73.1
58% 72.5 Pts
QC Int 251
QC Float 218
QC Mixed 244
54% 238 Pts
MC Int 331
MC Float 286
MC Mixed 324
47% 314 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$210
MSI(1462 2774) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.9.3
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.1% Average
Lighting 151
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 199
52% 146 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 148
Splatting 95.4
45% 103 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
41GB free
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 179
Write 88.1
Mixed 121
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 10.8
66% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 29.6
43% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 75%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$87
41GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 375
Mixed 399
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 31.3
116% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 47.8
52% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 115%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$116
937GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 86.6
Write 132
Mixed 94.6
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.25
86% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 79%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$64
723GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 168
Mixed 72.5
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.21
81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 5,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $852
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $210AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $65
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $220SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback