Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 09:29
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 482
64% 482 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 135
107% 136 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 128
Splatting 106
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 527
Mixed 794
204% 932 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 38.9
150% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 488
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 170
209% 369 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 158%
Great: 144%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
189GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 378
Write 129
Mixed 169
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 17.2
22% 5.84 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 101%
Adata SX910 128GB
116GB free
Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 489
Write 137
Mixed 232
62% 286 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 12.7
108% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 50.5
70% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 83%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
23GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 402
Mixed 415
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 47.7
166% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 126
145% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 115
Write 109
Mixed 114
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.06
14% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
463GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 82.1
Write 74.9
Mixed 84.1
61% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 23.1
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback