Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron Dual Core T3100 976 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 46.8 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 30 25% 34.3 Pts	4-Core 51.2 8-Core 45.2 7% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 52.1 3% 52.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 1526) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2057 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.34% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.38 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.57 0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.34% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V Series 128GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: E120506a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (87^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5288 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3306 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 39 39 171800395815 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	36.6% Below average	Read 228 Write 190 Mixed 215 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 10.3 50% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 29.1 DQ Mixed 23.5 17% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 45%
Samsung SSD 850 PRO 128G 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 91GB free, PID 6388 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.2% Below average	Read 33.1 Write 26.2 Mixed 29.3 37% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.24 4K Write 6.26 4K Mixed 3.87 368% 5.45 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron Dual-Core T3000IntelBench 34%, 1,043 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 4 Series Express Chipset Family v2MobileBench 0%, 39 samples	1x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

SSD
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GBBench 66%, 1,084 samples	1x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16