ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Jumper EZbook
Motherboard	Jumper P313P
Memory	3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171106
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 09:00
Run Duration	442 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Celeron N3450 873 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	SC Int 47.1 SC Float 43.9 SC Mixed 46 36% 45.7 Pts	QC Int 180 QC Float 171 QC Mixed 177 40% 176 Pts	MC Int 184 MC Float 169 MC Mixed 172 26% 175 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 2,628 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4664 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	3.05% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 6.4 2% 7.33 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 13.4 4% 9.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.05% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian N480 240GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 223GB free Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 42 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 160 (A3) Unknown 100 100 17 (A4) Unknown 100 100 16234 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10 (A6) Unknown 100 100 5 (A7) Unknown 100 100 6 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 48424 (F2) Unknown 100 100 44886 (F5) Unknown 100 100 32468	1.57% Terrible	Read 5.57 Write 2.84 Mixed 1.95 1% 3.45 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 1.28 4% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 110%
Sandisk SDW64G 63GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 25GB free Firmware: 0.1 SYSTEM 4KALIGNED Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 276 Write 75.3 Mixed 117 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 2.76 27% 8.66 MB/s	DQ Read 9.18 DQ Write 18.8 DQ Mixed 2.65 5% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	30% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330	Nvidia GTX 1070 $447	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170	AMD RX 480 $350	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $193	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay Newegg

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

User Guide • About • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer Feedback