User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.84%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardDefault Cherry Trail CR
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 07:53
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
SC Int 12.7
SC Float 9.1
SC Mixed 14.7
10% 12.2 Pts
QC Int 63.3
QC Float 39.8
QC Mixed 47.6
11% 50.2 Pts
MC Int 77.2
MC Float 46.8
MC Mixed 64.5
10% 62.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.1
1% 3.1 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 3.2
1% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung DJNB4R 125GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.7
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 142
Write 114
Mixed 129
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 4.69
35% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 4.23
10% 22 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.9 GB/s
Latency 292
14% 292 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback