Asrock P67 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130122
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 07:52
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 95.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 452 57% 433 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1592 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 71 Parallax 62.8 52% 65.9 fps	MRender 73.4 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 57.5 52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 615GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 190 190 25782714571 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1949 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6934 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1062 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7789 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7789 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 219044315162 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63% Good	Read 107 Write 113 Mixed 114 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.14 55% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 108%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 99GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 190 93773 (03) Spinup time 157 16 5116 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1315 (05) Reallocated sector count 42 42 1260 (07) Seek error rate 200 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4928 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 732 (C0) Power-off retract count 194 194 4990 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 174 174 80415 (C2) HDA temperature 127 91 20 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 1265 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 199 198 153	30.1% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 51.3 Mixed 48.9 39% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.27 58% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 44%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 256%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 30GB free Firmware: SD22 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 41354098 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2161 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 155523226 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25835 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 794 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2969 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8 (BD) vendor-specific 23 23 77 (BE) vendor-specific 76 53 403636248 (C2) HDA temperature 24 47 55834574872 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 26 21 41354098 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 9	38.6% Below average	Read 67.2 Write 67.2 Mixed 53.8 47% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.34 66% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 11,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 23.4 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 21 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 54.6 73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 - $170

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	78x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	53x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	20x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x
535 Series 240GBIntel $200Bench 79%, 9,142 samples	9x

RAM
99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 46%, 383 samples	10x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $658

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16