Lenovo F0C2000SUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0C2000SUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3647
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161115
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 03:16
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 587
63% 502 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 3647) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 13.1
12% 13 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 9.83
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT24L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
595GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback