Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101209
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 02:45
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 56.2 2-Core 113 54% 85.1 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 304 33% 262 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6255) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.5 33% 36.9 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 37 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460A 240GB-$177 1,086 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3270 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2155 (AB) Unknown 100 100 80984912 (AE) Unknown 100 100 14 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 89 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6082 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6338 (F9) Unknown 100 100 367693615	61.3% Good	Read 346 Write 396 Mixed 249 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 11.2 71% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 10.7 22% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 108%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 294GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 142 3841 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9848 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15999 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5502 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 54 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9793 (C2) HDA temperature 114 102 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 102 Mixed 98.2 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.38 107% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 218GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 167 2466 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3082 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3711 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2152 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3075 (C2) HDA temperature 118 107 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.6% Very good	Read 119 Write 130 Mixed 74.6 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.29 109% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 73GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 30 (03) Spinup time 144 142 3800 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5869 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21188 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5500 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5779 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 9	42.2% Average	Read 69.3 Write 77.8 Mixed 42.7 47% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.27 77% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 8GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 12.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16