Lenovo 20BF0031US

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 20BF0031US (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20BF0031US
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170502
Uptime	15.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 23:39
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4600M 7,260 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 82 2-Core 153 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 250 35% 258 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M 2,897 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8859 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.86% Terrible	Lighting 4.77 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 4 4% 4.15 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 4.07 Splatting 4.43 4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.86% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000 256GB 704 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4463 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 897 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 89 89 130 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4403 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 45 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 552 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 111 (EC) Unknown 99 99 86 (ED) Unknown 99 99 130 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	67.8% Good	Read 501 Write 256 Mixed 346 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 13.4 92% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 13.5 44% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 83%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 446GB free Firmware: JE3OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 176 176 73014444033 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 8456 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4619 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3633 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 70 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 29210 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 214748299285 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	47.8% Average	Read 81 Write 85.4 Mixed 79.7 62% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JSF51264HZ-1G4D1 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 15.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 20BF0031US

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)