MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 23:15
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 197 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 728 67% 561 Pts	64-Core 1,083 67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8423) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	21.1% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 23.5 Parallax 30.8 20% 26.4 fps	MRender 32.7 Gravity 28.4 Splatting 24.4 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,738 Write 1,110 Mixed 1,291 375% 1,713 MB/s	4K Read 53.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 29.4 176% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 87 100% 174 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 89GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3609 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 500 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 49 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 27 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7311066961	99.3% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 415 Mixed 419 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 41.2 158% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 40.4 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 89 77% 108 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106 3,124 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 77GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5353449 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 -114606907305657 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 894 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 834 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5353449 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5353449 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5353449 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23686 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14338 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14338 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20560	75.3% Very good	Read 503 Write 224 Mixed 291 74% 339 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 16.9 106% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 52.7 91% 180 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 88%
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 32GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 24 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18797 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3595 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 457 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3160697 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 2538179 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 977901952 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 87 87 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	42.8% Average	Read 257 Write 107 Mixed 150 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 6.75 72% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 47.3 57% 103 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 46%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 175 7483 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2118 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20846 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 937 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 458 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 144512 (C2) HDA temperature 118 105 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.3% Above average	Read 86.2 Write 89.4 Mixed 83.7 65% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.25 71% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 83%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 230GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 166 154 6666 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8729 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 52 52 35388 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3061 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 181 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8652 (C2) HDA temperature 115 90 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 186 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.5% Below average	Read 63 Write 60.4 Mixed 61.1 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.35 99% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 1,518 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 31.2 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 41.7 SC Mixed 27.1 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	102x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	100x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	81x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $399

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16