Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	88.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 21:02
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 143 2-Core 243 92% 161 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 901 83% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,235 76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.3 92% 109 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 100 Splatting 101 81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8148 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 317 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 92 (AE) Unknown 100 100 114 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 98 98 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 48 223339020315 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 7 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 100207588462 (F7) Unknown 100 100 3134676367 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1151162491 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4414 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	66.3% Good	Read 469 Write 298 Mixed 332 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 13 84% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 24.4 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 12.6 40% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 105%
Seagate ST2000DL001 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1TB free Firmware: CC92 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 88 148726216 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8074 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 62 190703601 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 44912 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1992 (B7) Unknown 89 89 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6401 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540394081 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 48 505282590 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1691 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6597 (C2) HDA temperature 30 52 64424509470 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 117 99 148726216 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 94 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 94 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 7421703528178 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2995281371 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2434367435	71.8% Very good	Read 132 Write 118 Mixed 97 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 815GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 162 6058 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1154 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3993 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 92 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 67 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5213 (C2) HDA temperature 125 108 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.3% Good	Read 119 Write 115 Mixed 104 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.19 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 101%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 268GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 177 7483 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2189 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22059 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 175 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 113 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 55659 (C2) HDA temperature 123 104 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	81.1% Excellent	Read 146 Write 137 Mixed 112 98% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 240GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 180 7433 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1716 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10825 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 141 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 94 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32856 (C2) HDA temperature 124 104 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.8% Above average	Read 108 Write 86.1 Mixed 96.5 73% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.27 82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3.5TB free, PID 3322 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 158 Write 96.4 Mixed 48.6 112% 101 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 5.53 4K Mixed 0.55 259% 6.76 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 376GB free, PID 3322 Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 89.1 Write 48.2 Mixed 67.1 81% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 7.64 4K Mixed 0.45 279% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40 28,855 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 26.2 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.3 SC Write 40.8 SC Mixed 29.9 89% 31 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	561x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	151x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $750

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16