Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '18 at 18:27
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 216 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 732 67% 563 Pts	64-Core 2,394 148% 2,394 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 153 Parallax 130 107% 138 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 127 Splatting 111 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 418GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 44 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 57 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 69 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 248034602	81.9% Excellent	Read 513 Write 416 Mixed 420 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 28.7 112% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 15.5 19% 32 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 191GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 1,575 Write 1,093 Mixed 1,146 282% 1,272 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 15.1 114% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 70.2 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 35.3 37% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 58GB free Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5830618 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 33122787798351 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1988 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 106 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 36 51541966874 (C2) HDA temperature 26 36 51541966874 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5830618 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5830618 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5830618 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 796 (EA) Unknown 0 0 574 (F1) Unknown 0 0 574 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1173	46.3% Average	Read 415 Write 107 Mixed 159 49% 227 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 9.07 71% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 45.8 DQ Write 88.8 DQ Mixed 25 31% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19602 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2134 (B1) Unknown 98 98 114 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 78 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23446116335	69.3% Good	Read 511 Write 341 Mixed 360 89% 404 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 14.8 88% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 16.1 24% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 64 116873229 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1385 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8194809 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 134990822115697 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1331 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 69 437583898 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3916 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 55834574874 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 109242493174816 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2974659472 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2054332086	93% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 152 Mixed 119 110% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.28 93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 1,151 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 36.9 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 23.5 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $899

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16