PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171031 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '18 at 03:00 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
66.4%
Good
|
||||
59.3%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR4 3200 2OZ 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 1,423x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 670x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 271x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 363x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 314x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 227x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $844 |