| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus Maximus II Formula (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100415 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 12 '18 at 02:38 |
| Run Duration | 229 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
57.7%
Above average
|
52% 82.7 Pts
|
30% 225 Pts
|
14% 224 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
30% 31.5 fps
|
30% 36.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
|
|
40.8%
Average
|
55% 73 MB/s
|
76% 0.79 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.6%
Poor
|
22% 7.73 GB/s
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
46% 86.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Maximus II Formula Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Maximus II Formula
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 3x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $624 |