Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 22:00
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 63.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 242 76% 143 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 971 86% 729 Pts	64-Core 2,662 165% 2,662 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 207 Parallax 182 115% 177 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 181 Splatting 135 122% 151 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 559GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1,677 Write 1,951 Mixed 1,655 395% 1,761 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 31.5 180% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 45.8 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 31.7 36% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 363%
Samsung 830 512GB-$500 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 398GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7365 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1428 (B1) Unknown 99 99 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 59 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1220 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11210551849	79.9% Very good	Read 508 Write 380 Mixed 436 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 22.6 96% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 14.1 50% 114 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 85%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 100GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 810 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 534 (B1) Unknown 98 98 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3742491026	65.9% Good	Read 491 Write 272 Mixed 279 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 13.8 97% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 35.1 DQ Write 42.6 DQ Mixed 13.7 17% 30.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 114%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 222 197 7883 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 66 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 60 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 207 (C2) HDA temperature 122 117 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	84.5% Excellent	Read 147 Write 147 Mixed 137 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.82 4K Mixed 0.28 124% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 97%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 222 198 7875 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 67 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 60 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 211 (C2) HDA temperature 122 116 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	77.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 138 Mixed 136 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.32 124% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (86^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	126% Outstanding	MC Read 49.8 MC Write 51.7 MC Mixed 49.2 144% 50.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 20.3 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 122%

UFO

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 148%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	104x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	83x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	60x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	14x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
CMR16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 731 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $869

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16