Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-V (all builds)
Memory	0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121011
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 21:57
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 48.9 1-Core 45.8 2-Core 82.5 36% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 233 25% 201 Pts	64-Core 265 16% 265 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.4% Below average	Lighting 42.2 Reflection 40 Parallax 35.6 34% 39.3 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 33 29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 50076783 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 66718021982007 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1198 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 71 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 37 47 38657785893 (C2) HDA temperature 37 47 38657785893 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 50076783 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 50076783 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 50076783 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11511 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8065 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8065 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13138	37.8% Below average	Read 328 Write 146 Mixed 183 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 7.57 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 11 44% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 7.46 19% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 170 4358 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 487 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 258 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 36978 (C2) HDA temperature 112 102 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.6% Good	Read 109 Write 127 Mixed 89.9 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.27 89% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 201GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 173 169 4316 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6288 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20905 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5361 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 454 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5833 (C2) HDA temperature 110 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.2% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 96.2 Mixed 77.6 66% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 0.66 4K Mixed 0.14 38% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 11,204 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	222x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	149x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16