| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus M51AC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M51AC |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130725 |
| Uptime | 4.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 11 '18 at 17:55 |
| Run Duration | 97 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4770S-$102
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
69.7%
Good
|
67% 116 Pts
|
50% 397 Pts
|
32% 514 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8431) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
7.07%
Terrible
|
7% 8.77 fps
|
7% 8.63 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
83% 111 MB/s
|
26% 0.22 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.6%
Poor
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
23% 8.17 GB/s
|
50% 80.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 626 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M51AC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 385x |
| Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples | 125x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 41x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $200 |