Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150513
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 11 '18 at 15:07
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 128
59% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 183
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
ASRock(1849 990C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 7.75
3% 6.01 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 4.96
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 503
Write 345
Mixed 394
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 34.9
129% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 63
69% 117 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$100
123GB free
Firmware: GK8OA87A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 57.2
Mixed 76.2
45% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.25
80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 47%
WDC WD10 EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
307GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 54.4
Write 54.3
Mixed 50.4
68% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.31
86% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99924-15- 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $375
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback