Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 10:36
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 199 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 511 51% 417 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 88.3 56% 74.4 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 54 49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 26 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 16 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 65 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 318270919	83.8% Excellent	Read 499 Write 404 Mixed 412 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 22.2 118% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 38.6 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 20.3 38% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB 7,607 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.1% Very good	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 27.9 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 22 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 97.9 41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	33x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	12x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 8,300 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16