Asus P5Q SE

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q SE (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '18 at 22:06
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8200-$12 4,318 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 64.9 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 72.8 38% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 74.1 8-Core 73.5 10% 73.8 Pts	64-Core 73.5 4% 73.5 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 026E) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 2.88 3% 4.06 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.13 3% 3.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 466 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 201 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2475839637	38.5% Below average	Read 239 Write 193 Mixed 198 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 14.2 51% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 13.9 16% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 716GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 126 126 6666 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1401 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1393 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 29152 (C2) HDA temperature 126 99 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.9% Average	Read 76.6 Write 76.7 Mixed 14.8 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.19 55% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 59%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB 1,385 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 63GB free Firmware: VA111900 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 189 187 24800 (04) Start/Stop count 252 252 3298 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 250 239 49876 (09) Power-on hours count 235 235 6546 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 247 247 2711 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 44 387055639 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 41 253 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1509 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 252 0	39.1% Below average	Read 65.9 Write 69.2 Mixed 55.1 48% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 4.41 4K Mixed 0.22 124% 1.69 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.9 17% 5.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q SE Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	16x
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	11x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	5x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	42x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	19x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16