| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1824 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160531 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 10 '18 at 15:05 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.7%
Above average
|
54% 85 Pts
|
24% 179 Pts
|
11% 175 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.59
|
18.4%
Very poor
|
17% 21.8 fps
|
20% 24.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
44.9%
Average
|
50% 228 MB/s
|
62% 19.4 MB/s
|
16% 29.1 MB/s
|
|
|
59.6%
Above average
|
60% 271 MB/s
|
89% 32.5 MB/s
|
25% 46.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.3%
Below average
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
53% 75.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 155x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 65x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |