Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 08 '18 at 21:30
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 143
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 475
44% 370 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 88
56% 72.8 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 53.9
Splatting 77.7
54% 63.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 472
Write 369
Mixed 400
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 35.3
124% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 58.4
64% 108 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 124%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 487
Write 450
Mixed 481
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 13.5
68% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 62.5
66% 109 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
781GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 172
Mixed 154
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.23
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.26
124% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $311
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback