Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V13.1
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '18 at 20:33
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 59.2 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 102 43% 70.5 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 291 29% 237 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Clevo(1558 8503) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.3% Poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 55.7 8% 25.8 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 49.6 Splatting 59.7 47% 57.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB 10,917 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 221 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 157 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 6 (AE) Unknown 99 99 6 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 826 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 50 44 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16693328 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2027 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1663 (F9) Unknown 99 99 2027	80.4% Excellent	Read 496 Write 462 Mixed 493 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 21.5 102% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 59.2 DQ Mixed 78.4 50% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 116%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 804GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 69 81197167 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 615 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2367281 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -32414118182693 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 156 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 55 437649434 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2987 (C2) HDA temperature 26 45 73014444058 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 56882546868261 (F1) Unknown 100 253 777162066 (F2) Unknown 100 253 524739043 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	70.7% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 67.6 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.16 4K Mixed 0.55 184% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 23 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	29x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	21x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	10x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	4x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16