Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 07 '18 at 21:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 133
2-Core 254
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 988
88% 746 Pts
64-Core 2,330
144% 2,330 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 175
Parallax 185
127% 172 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 176
Splatting 125
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
935GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,977
Write 1,679
Mixed 1,740
401% 1,798 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 19.2
124% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 155
112% 138 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 223%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 399
Mixed 420
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 39.9
133% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 115
121% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,750
Write 1,158
Mixed 1,179
302% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 23.8
136% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 8.43
32% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 185%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback