Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	18.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120316
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 16:44
Run Duration	289 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 136 57% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 381 39% 317 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250 5,806 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 843E) 384MB Ram: 384MB, Driver: Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 0.47 1% 0.99 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.05 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 28926637 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 106291850641435 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 16 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 42 81607131169 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 81607131169 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 28926637 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 28926637 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 28926637 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294959529 (EA) Unknown 0 0 207 (F1) Unknown 0 0 207 (F2) Unknown 0 0 230 (F4) Unknown 99 99 4718638	36.9% Below average	Read 300 Write 164 Mixed 169 46% 211 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 9.36 47% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 18.9 DQ Mixed 9.29 10% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 65%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 775GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7391 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7977 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 16794 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4598 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 469 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7507 (C2) HDA temperature 119 92 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.5% Good	Read 133 Write 109 Mixed 83.8 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.39 124% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 463GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 151 151 34387263829 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3031 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5490 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1858 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3032 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3032 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 188979871781 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.9% Good	Read 123 Write 120 Mixed 11.2 61% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.2 97% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 107%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 8.82 Mixed 10.8 16% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.006 22% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x8GB 7,706 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	13x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	11x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16