Asus H81M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-A (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 15:57
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$59 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 196 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 294 39% 294 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E348) CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 25.7 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 31.2 21% 29.6 fps	MRender 31.1 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 35.3 25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3740 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1154 (A5) Unknown 100 100 405106 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 103 (AE) Unknown 100 100 78 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 32 236224249888 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 343 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 146 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8060285801 (F2) Unknown 100 100 15480602309	43.8% Average	Read 439 Write 253 Mixed 327 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 9.71 4K Mixed 7.41 33% 9.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 13.5 DQ Mixed 8.28 9% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 626GB free Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 171 4350 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 218 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 927 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 213 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 181 (C2) HDA temperature 112 104 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	73% Very good	Read 134 Write 120 Mixed 119 94% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.44 132% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 74%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 118GB free Firmware: 1AR1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 10 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 84 76 5008 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5904 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7720 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4620 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 107 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 201864380445 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 24 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5934	60.7% Good	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 116 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.32 99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 26,466 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	236x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	123x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	110x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	175x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	116x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	107x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	91x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	36x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16