MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170920
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 03:42
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 77.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 886 80% 672 Pts	64-Core 1261 78% 1261 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 159 Parallax 145 113% 147 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 138 Splatting 116 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB 1,211 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8.1 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 584 Write 234 Mixed 295 81% 371 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 17.8 81% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 19.5 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 12.3 18% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 99%
Amd-raid Array 2 500GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 425GB free Firmware: 8.1 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 85.1 Mixed 97.2 72% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.58 4K Mixed 0.43 127% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 97%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 368GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 85.7 Write 91.5 Mixed 86.3 114% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.28 67% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	89.7% Excellent	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 29.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 25.5 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	250x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	225x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	180x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	121x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	54x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	53x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $899

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16