Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '18 at 18:23
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 201
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 325
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.7% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 26.6
24% 25.4 fps
MRender 32.4
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 26.8
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUGA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 514
Write 478
Mixed 502
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 21.7
118% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 23.7
30% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
959GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 159
Mixed 155
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.22
88% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
856GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 155
Mixed 145
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 115
Write 24.7
Mixed 43.7
62% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.08
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.87
84% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback