| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
| Memory | 1.6 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101018 |
| Uptime | 22.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 05 '18 at 10:54 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
|
47%
Average
|
59% 103 Pts
|
20% 151 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.88
|
6.05%
Terrible
|
6% 7.35 fps
|
7% 8.76 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
69.8%
Good
|
47% 209 MB/s
|
131% 43.4 MB/s
|
95% 153 MB/s
|
|
|
34.5%
Below average
|
48% 63.1 MB/s
|
80% 0.76 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.6%
Poor
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
22% 7.67 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z200 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |