Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 19:30
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 71.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 249 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 830 82% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,055 65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 15 Parallax 18 16% 17.4 fps	MRender 16.1 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 19.7 15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 1,591 Write 1,262 Mixed 1,155 297% 1,336 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 39.4 148% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 155 163% 271 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 254%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 175 4133 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 39 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 191 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 36 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 871 (C2) HDA temperature 115 113 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	78.5% Very good	Read 136 Write 137 Mixed 136 103% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.25 109% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 84%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 775GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 37 Write 38.2 Mixed 37 48% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.21 82% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 24%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 726GB free, PID 022a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 39.7 Mixed 38.4 50% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.32 58% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 37%
WDC WD15 EARS-00MVWB0 1.5TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 169GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 83.9 Write 76.4 Mixed 73.2 99% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.17 82% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.6% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 14.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 9.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	493x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	55x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16