Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 12:57
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7740X-$281 5,094 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Memory 98.3 1-Core 148 2-Core 281 98% 176 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 820 83% 673 Pts	64-Core 822 51% 822 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.59 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 22.8 Parallax 18.5 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 25.9 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 347GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 99 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 254 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8 (AE) Unknown 100 100 70 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 41 253403856930 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4322958940 (F7) Unknown 100 100 135623727 (F8) Unknown 100 100 39720174 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1935 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	74.4% Very good	Read 470 Write 294 Mixed 337 81% 367 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 19.1 89% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 12.2 74% 172 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 98%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 46GB free Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5837 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2271 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 146 (AE) Unknown 100 100 494 (B5) Unknown 100 100 10003033884113 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 83 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	60.6% Good	Read 485 Write 189 Mixed 273 69% 316 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 6.43 88% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 6.06 36% 82 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 72%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 22GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3158 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 998 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 422 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327705 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 117 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 95 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1364	71.1% Very good	Read 508 Write 351 Mixed 358 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 10 82% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 246 DQ Mixed 49.3 64% 108 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 97%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 93GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 174 2116 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2890 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6553 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1914 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 150 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2739 (C2) HDA temperature 118 106 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	98.3% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 159 Mixed 126 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.33 153% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 19.8 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 22 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 44.4 90% 44.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	104x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	66x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	23x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	18x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	74x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	47x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $840

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16