PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | MSI MS-7345 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20070511 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 03 '18 at 16:50 |
Run Duration | 101 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
52.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7970-$435
Asus(1043 0448) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
34.4%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 18x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 5x |
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 5x |
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |