ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2347D85

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Lenovo 2347D85 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2347D85
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120525
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '18 at 01:06
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 156 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 235 31% 235 Pts	64-Core 235 15% 235 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 3.16 4% 4.58 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 2.53 Splatting 8.7 5% 5.22 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 0 0 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4141 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1718 (AB) Unknown 100 100 80558928 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (D0) Spin buzz 100 100 97 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 1 (E9) Unknown 97 97 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4290 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5712 (F9) Unknown 100 100 238727609	78.3% Very good	Read 445 Write 415 Mixed 431 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 24.6 80% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 70 94% 175 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 320GB free Firmware: GH2ZB390 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 8699 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 8969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 5403 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 974913577 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 88203 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 201863659552 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	63.3% Good	Read 105 Write 115 Mixed 105 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.21 87% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.9 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback